Home Blog Page 65

#MakeInIndia: Mumbai’s First Underground Metro Line Will Get Driverless Trains Manufactured Domestically#MakeInIndia: Mumbai’s First Underground Metro Line Will Get Driverless Trains Manufactured Domestically

0

The Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation (MMRC), a joint venture between the Centre and Maharashtra to build and operate the capital city’s first underground metro corridor has selected French rail manufacturer Alstom to supply the coaches for the line. Five companies had bid for the project including China’s CRRC whose subsidiary CSR Nanjing Puzhen had supplied the coaches for the first line in the city.

Alstom has been selected for the lowest bid and also because of the newer metro norms imposed by the Centre that mandates 75 per cent of coaches be manufactured locally. India currently has three metro coach manufactures – Bombardier, Alstom and state-owned BEML. Alstom has supplied rolling stock manufactured in Sri City, Andhra Pradesh and Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu for the Chennai and Kochi metros.

While the underground Line 3 will feature communication-based train control (CBTC) that was first implemented on the Reliance Infrastructure-built Line 1, the trains will also be designed for driverless operations. While the recently opened Magenta and Pink lines of the Delhi Metro too have similar capabilities, this will be the first time that driverless trains will be manufactured in India.

In January this year, it was reported that Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis wanted coach manufacturers to set up factories in Maharashtra as part of his Make In Maharashtra programme. CRRC, owned by the Chinese government had proposed investing Rs 1,500 crore to set up a manufacturing facility at Butibori for the Nagpur Metro.

Maharashtra currently has an operational Metro line and Monorail line in Mumbai, with three lines under construction in Mumbai and one each in Navi Mumbai, Nagpur and Pune.

#MakeInIndia: Mumbai’s First Underground Metro Line Will Get Driverless Trains Manufactured Domestically

0

The Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation (MMRC), a joint venture between the Centre and Maharashtra to build and operate the capital city’s first underground metro corridor has selected French rail manufacturer Alstom to supply the coaches for the line. Five companies had bid for the project including China’s CRRC whose subsidiary CSR Nanjing Puzhen had supplied the coaches for the first line in the city.

Alstom has been selected for the lowest bid and also because of the newer metro norms imposed by the Centre that mandates 75 per cent of coaches be manufactured locally. India currently has three metro coach manufactures – Bombardier, Alstom and state-owned BEML. Alstom has supplied rolling stock manufactured in Sri City, Andhra Pradesh and Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu for the Chennai and Kochi metros.

While the underground Line 3 will feature communication-based train control (CBTC) that was first implemented on the Reliance Infrastructure-built Line 1, the trains will also be designed for driverless operations. While the recently opened Magenta and Pink lines of the Delhi Metro too have similar capabilities, this will be the first time that driverless trains will be manufactured in India.

In January this year, it was reported that Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis wanted coach manufacturers to set up factories in Maharashtra as part of his Make In Maharashtra programme. CRRC, owned by the Chinese government had proposed investing Rs 1,500 crore to set up a manufacturing facility at Butibori for the Nagpur Metro.

Maharashtra currently has an operational Metro line and Monorail line in Mumbai, with three lines under construction in Mumbai and one each in Navi Mumbai, Nagpur and Pune.

Swappable Batteries: A Game-Changing Alternative Or A Viable Auxiliary In EV Infrastructure?

0
Snapshot
  • Battery swapping will remain commercially viable only as a complementary service to EV charging infrastructures and policy makers must accept this.

Batteries hold the key in the battle between electric vehicles (EVs) and fossil fuel-based conventional vehicles (CV). The battery cost, charging efficiency and range are the three key factors which impact the competitiveness of EVs against CVs. While range issues can only be addressed through technological innovation, issues surrounding cost and charging efficiency can arguably be addressed by segregating battery from the rest of the EV, in its ownership and charging mechanism. On paper, swappable batteries hold game changing potential for the EV ecosystem. In a November 2017 blogpost, even Asian Development Bank strongly advocated swappable batteries for the Indian EV market. However, the enthusiasm around swappable batteries comes with doubts about its commercial viability.

Swappable batteries can potentially reduce the EV cost significantly if the EV owner is not the owner of the battery. By splitting the ownership of the vehicle from the batteries, the upfront cost of EVs can be significantly brought down, as batteries constitute amongst the most expensive components of an EV. In such case, EV owner will merely be paying for the charge that it receives in a fully charged battery and a leasing fee for leasing the battery for use.

Leasing fee will ideally include, besides return on investment, (i) the cost of the battery ammortised over its lifetime, (ii) the cost of the swapping infrastructure, (iii) the cost of the inventory that the battery owner will need to maintain, and (iv) insurance cost of the batteries (including the inventory) against damage, theft and other loss. The battery owner may charge a combined price linked to the effective capacity supplied, however such price will effectively need to take into account the charged capacity supplied, and the other fixed costs of the battery owner. The experience of Better Place, a US-based startup that attempted establishing battery swapping facilities, showed that a facility that is cost efficient for the consumer may cost dearly to the entrepreneur. Battery weight necessarily means that the process of swapping will need to be a mechanical process, as the owner is unlikely to be able to pull out the battery himself/herself and replace it. The cost of mechanical or robotic swapping infrastructure may, in fact, be significant.

In addition, if swapping is to become a principal source of charging, then the battery owner will need to maintain a significantly large inventory, as swapping is premised on the assumption that it is more time effective. The larger the inventory, the higher will be the cost to the consumer. Rapid growth in the battery and charging technology in the recent years means that the battery owner will shoulder higher risk of inventory obsoleteness. This would necessarily mean that the battery owner will be incentivised to ammortise the inventory cost over lesser years, thereby increasing the charging price to the consumer. On the other hand, the operator of the swapping facility will face the pressure of keeping the cost of charged batteries low enough to keep it competitive against charging of the battery from a charging facility.

There is little doubt that with a proper mechanised system, battery swapping can be achieved in a time duration comparable to refueling the CVs, at least for now. This will be a massive improvement over current charging technologies that require batteries to be plugged into a charger for a considerably long time. EV enthusiasts argue that any car is usually parked idly for a long time, whether at homes or at parking lots in offices, which time can be used for charging the vehicle. This is a solution far from perfect, particularly when the vehicles have to be driven over long distances, or where parking areas do not offer sufficient charging infrastructure.

Swappable batteries may offer a solution to this problem but this comes with caveats. If battery ownership is distinct from EV ownership, the battery owner/s should have a large geographical presence. Further, either it must be the same battery owner that must operate multiple facilities, or different battery owners must agree to accept batteries owned by different owners in their swapping stations. Different batteries will have different life, and an owner accepting an older discharged battery against a newer charged battery that it supplies to the EV owner may not work, unless an efficient and trustworthy accounting mechanism is put in place between the owners of swapping facilities to account for different batteries exchanged at the swapping stations. The investment required for setting up such a large number of swapping stations coupled with the inventory cost may itself be the beginning of the end of the idea. The Better Place experiment folded up within a few years of its inception, arguably due to its high initial investment. As the charging technology makes progress, and charging becomes faster, swapping may lose its viability even further.

In addition, for battery swapping to succeed as a viable commercial idea, batteries will need to be standardised. This requires the EV manufacturers and original battery manufacturers to collectively agree to have standard batteries for EVs. This is easier said than done, as many EV manufacturers may not be happy foregoing their ability to control proprietary battery designs. EV design may also be affected by the battery design, and the EV manufacturer may want the freedom to design batteries to suit their EV design, rather than be tied to a standard design or make. Enforcing standardisation through regulatory intervention may not be the ideal approach, particularly when the technology is still evolving and is yet to stabilise.

Large scale charging of batteries at a single location, particularly high capacity batteries, also poses challenges for electricity utilities, as such swapping facilities will need extremely high load connections. For example, if a swapping station wishes to serve about 100 cars (with 30-35 KW batteries), a simple ball park assumption will require it to keep about 150 or more batteries on charge at any point in time. This will require swapping facility to have a sanctioned load of up to 4-5 MW. The utilities may not yet be ready to provide such load with the current transmission and distribution infrastructure.

Does this mean battery swapping has no future? Perhaps, it still has some relevance for EV driven public transport, where quick charging is a pressing need for vehicles constantly on the move. State utilities/public transporters operating large fleets may find the swapping technology a commercially viable proposition. Swapping facility for transport vehicles engaged in last mile connectivity with batteries of smaller capacity and size may also achieve viability, and it may have its use in emergency situations too. However, it will remain commercially viable only as a complementary service to charging infrastructures. Therefore, it will be prudent for policy makers to steer clear of the push for swapping facilities over charging facilities. In the short run, the demand for swapping, however, may produce a unicorn with a novel business model for swapping.

Also read: The Burning Question About Electric Vehicles – What Kind Of Batteries Do We Use?

Work Begins On Rs 25 Billion Expansion At Chennai Airport; L&T Performs Bhumi Puja

0

Officials of the Airports Authority of India (AAI) and infrastructure major Larsen and Toubro (L&T) yesterday conducted a bhumi puja to commence the work on the Rs 25 billion expansion to the Chennai International Airport in Tamil Nadu’s capital city.

The project involves construction of a new terminal building to double the airport’s capacity, straightening both runways at the Meenambakkam end, and the construction of rapid exit taxiways. Chennai’s secondary runway is currently India’s only runway that passes over a river (the Adyar).

The current terminal, measuring 72,000 sq metre was commissioned in 2012 and can currently handle 17 million passengers per annum, although the airport handled 20.5 million passengers.

The new terminal, spread out over 336,000 sq metre will double this capacity to 34 million and along with the associated upgrades will enable the airport to handle 42 aircraft per hour instead of the current 36, according to a Business Standard report.

The airport’s current remote parking for aircraft is deemed difficult to access and a tunnel has been proposed to ease movement of aircraft. It handled 32 aircraft per hour in 2016 which was increased to 36 in 2017 after the first rapid exit taxiway was commissioned.

The airport is currently connected to the rest of the city through the Chennai Metro, suburban rail and the Grand Southern Trunk Road (GST Road).

Watch: What India’s Data Policy Should Look Like

0

The Srikrishna Committee is in the final stages of drafting the data protection bill.

With the internet user count in India set to touch the one billion mark in the next decade, what India does with its data laws could go on to become a case study for nations across the world.

Therefore, India’s data protection bill, which has been long in the making, must get the basics right while leaving just enough room for improvement and improvisation.

Watch the video to learn more.

Highways Construction Touches 26 Km Per Day, Over 2,300 Km Highways Laid In First Quarter Of The Financial Year

0

Highway construction has seen a rapid growth in last four years under the present government. It has touched 26 km per day in the period between April -June this year, as against 25 km per day in the same period last year, the Financial Express has reported.

A total of 2,345 km of highways were built in the first quarter of this financial year, against 2,260 km in the corresponding period last year.

National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has seen the fastest increase in construction of highways. It has increased from 1.8 km a day in the first quarter last year to 8.3 km a day in the same period this year.

NHAI largely builds highways under the Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM), where the government bears 40 per cent of the project cost. The Ministry of Roads, Transports and Highways, on the other hand, generally implements the projects via engineering, procurement and construction route. Under this, the government bears all the project costs.

The present Narendra Modi government has built 73 per cent more highways in the first four years than the previous government in its last four years. The present government has constructed 28,531 km of highways in four years since 2014-15, whereas the previous government had constructed just 16,505 km in its last four years till 2013-14.

Also Read: Gadkari Discovers A Smart Way To Beat High Land Costs For Building Highways

Much Delayed Jaitapur Nuclear Power Plant May Soon See The Light Of Day

0
Snapshot
  • With the governments of France and India fully supporting the project, the Jaitapur Nuclear Power Plant project is firmly put back on track.

In June 2018, French electricity utility company Electricite De France (EDF) and American multinational General Electric agreed to jointly build six nuclear reactors for the Jaitapur Nuclear Power Plant (JNPP). For years, the JNPP has been mired in delays due to several setbacks. In 2015, during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to France, a memorandum of understanding (MoU) between French firm Areva SA and India’s Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) was signed to set up six nuclear power plants in Jaitapur. Despite the delays, the power plant now seems to be back on track with India and France determined to take this project forward in all earnestness.

The Project And Initial Delays

The JNPP project, in Ratnagiri district of Maharashtra, once commissioned, is expected to generate approximately 10,000 megawatt (MW) of electricity and, therefore, along with the Tarapur Atomic Power Station, a total of 110,000 MW of electricity would be generated, giving Maharashtra the capability of producing maximum power in the country. The project is reported to be about 10 times the size of Chernobyl power plant.

This ambitious project, which was signed between France and India in 2010, has, however, been saddled with delays in the past due to many reasons. First, there was a change in government in both France and India, and then Areva underwent a financial crisis following which it had to be bailed out by the EDF. The EDF also quoted a higher price of about 25 per cent from the original quotation of Rs 30 crore per MW. This quoted price did not suit India’s demand for cost-effective nuclear energy. Second, in the first instance, both Areva and NPCIL agreed upon the reference plant, which was producing 1,430 MW of electricity while Areva later on turned to demand for a reference plant with more power generation capacity, which could produce 1,600 MW of electricity. This became a bone of contention, since, according to the Department of Atomic Energy, “if the technology (more power generating capacity) has been enhanced, even then the reference plant cannot be changed”.

This demand from Areva was also not taken to positively by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB). Third, the project was mired in controversy due to political and public resistance to the nuclear power project on the pretext of environmental concerns and threat to livelihood of the local population. The local population vehemently opposed the project since they felt it would have an adverse effect on their livelihood. Fourth, the controversial Nuclear Liability Act 2010 was also a sticking point. Fifth, following the Fukushima accident in Japan, France got entangled in ensuring and reviewing nuclear safety measures. It must be noted that in April 2017, there were reports that a delegation representing the French government and the EDF assured India that they would implement technologies to build the nuclear power plant in such a way that it would avoid Fukushima-type disasters.

It is important to note that between 2005 and 2015, NPCIL had done all it could to educate and inform the local people and the political parties about the benefits of nuclear power plant project. The NPCIL has organised various meetings to clear any queries or doubts of the local population as well as political parties regarding the project.[1] NPCIL also confirmed that the setting up of the power project would “not have any adverse effect on the livelihood of the local population” and will have “no major impact” on activities such as fishing.[2] Moreover, NPCIL also confirmed that the power plant project would provide employment to many people and preference would be given to those who have been affected by the construction of the nuclear plant.[3] The French government also assured in 2017 that, “implementation of the project will be on the norms of Make in Maharashtra Initiative”, ensuring maximum employment generation for locals. Around 60 per cent of project will be built domestically, thus helping the local industrial sector benefit.

In addition, India’s External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj and her French counterpart, in 2017, clarified that civil nuclear cooperation would remain an “important pillar” of India’s engagement with France and both the countries would also look for ways to expedite the JNPP project.

However, EDF is not the only company to be involved in this project. According to a report, Assystem, Egis, Reliance and Bouygues are the four companies that could be involved in installation of an engineering platform for Jaitapur. In addition, Larsen and Toubro, AFCEN and Bureau Veritas of France would provide a training centre for design and construction standards that need to be kept in mind during the manufacturing of equipment crucial to the JNPP. The NPCIL, on the other hand, is tasked with the role of securing certifications as well as being responsible for overall monitoring of JNPP.

With growing demand for energy to drive development, nuclear energy would remain crucial to India. This is more evident from Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis’ remarks on the project in April 2015 post-Modi’s visit to France that the project would move ahead and be a crucial step towards generation of power. Nevertheless, this cooperation will open several avenues for India to cooperate with France in nuclear technology-related matters, which include nuclear waste management, developing nuclear proliferation-resistant technologies and nuclear safety measures.

Andheri Bridge Collapse: Independent Infrastructure Audits Needed Desperately

0
Snapshot
  • Public structures that are used by thousands, if not more, of people every day need to undergo regular audits. Any less and it would mean compromising public safety.

It seems like it takes a disaster for any constructive action to be undertaken in our country. This attitude has cost us not just millions of dollars but also hundreds of lives time and again.

The collapse of the Andheri road overbridge is the latest case of this pattern of behaviour. A section of the Gokhale bridge caved in at Andheri station on Tuesday (3 July). The fall ripped apart overhead wires on the southern end of the station near platforms 7 and 8, bringing railway traffic to a standstill. Luckily, the two platforms see lower rail traffic compared to others. And thankfully, that was probably the reason why only a few unfortunately had to pay the price for the bridge collapse, which is a clear case of neglect and lack of proactive civic vigilance on the part of the administration.

A bridge used by thousands each day doesn’t cave in without showing signs of a possible collapse. And if it did, it says a lot about the quality of construction.

And this comes within months of the Elphinstone bridge episode that resulted in a stampede, killing around 23 people and injuring many more.

Typically, a series of blame games among different agencies ensue, even as citizens bear the brunt of their negligence. It takes a fire accident in a rooftop restaurant for the city to wake up to illegal licensing, for instance, or a bridge collapse for safety audits to be proposed. Only after a roof collapsed in Delhi’s Connaught Place did the authorities think of assessing the structural stability of the buildings at various shopping hubs in the city.

All it takes, come to think of it, is to put a system in place. A regular mandatory independent infrastructure audit of large public structures is all that is needed. That is something that is mandated by the Indian Road Congress rules and the Bridge Institute manual.

Deccan Herald report one day after the Andheri bridge collapse speaks of how Bengaluru too has had no audit of any of its structures. Which means no underpass, bridge, or other structures, which have thousands of commuters using it every day, have had any audits of their safety, strength, or design.

“No audit has ever been done of any infrastructure projects in the city. All that the agencies do is tar the roads and claim maintenance has been done. The audit should comprise load bearing, reflections, vibrations, carrying capacity, and deflection,” said adviser and expert member to the state government for traffic, transport, and infrastructure M N Sreehari, as quoted by the daily.

Union Minister Piyush Goyal visited the Andheri bridge collapse site and announced that the railways would carry out a safety audit of around 445 road and overbridges or bridges over pipelines that cross railway tracks at various suburban stations.

Something similar was announced after the Elphinstone tragedy too. The minister, as reported by the Hindu, said that a structural audit of the now-collapsed bridge was conducted in November last year. And apparently, there was so sign of danger. How, then, did the bridge fall?

Most civic bodies have their in-house engineers conducting audits. Clearly, the audits, if and when they do take place, aren’t up to mark. Else, these accidents wouldn’t occur.

It would be best to constitute an independent body that undertakes regular audits of these large structures, especially of those which see a high traffic of people and vehicles. Separate sections within this team can look at various infrastructural projects. For instance, for bridges alone, a record of the location and condition of all the bridges within the city can be created; then, a bridge maintenance programme that involves a risk-based approach to the classification of bridges can be formulated.

An independent body would also solve the issues of jurisdiction. The said body can also interact with citizen bodies and ensure co-operation for undertaking repair or restoration works if need be. It will also serve as an agency that the citizens can directly contact in case they wish to bring to notice any such structures that need maintenance.

Willing Farmers Look For Sweet Deal To Part With Their Lands For Salem-Chennai Expressway

0
Snapshot
  • Swarajya spoke to the farmers whose lands are set to be acquired by the government for building the Salem-Chennai green expressway in Tamil Nadu.There has been much mainstream noise around the conflict between the government and farmers. This report cuts through it and uncovers the reality on ground.

Palayam in Harur taluk of Tamil Nadu’s Dharmapuri district is a typical backward village with its people depending on rains to irrigate their farms on the foothills of Theerthamalai. Some of its inmates, like Kuppusamy, travel to nearby Coimbatore district for their livelihood since returns from their farms are inconsistent.

Palayam is among the villages that are in the limelight after the central and state governments announced plans to construct a 274km Salem-Chennai long green expressway corridor. The expressway will pass through this village with the lands and houses of 19 of its inmates likely to be affected.

“I have three acres of land including this house,” says Kuppusamy showing his mud-walled house with a palm leaf roof. “All this is likely to be taken for the expressway, going by what the officials told me,” he says.

“I have no problem in giving up my land and property, provided I am given a good compensation,” Kuppusamy says, as his neighbour Salaithoppu nods in agreement.

Salaithoppu’s two acres of land with a good number of coconut, guava, lemon, custard apple, and mango trees, in addition to a couple of teak wood trees, are likely to be taken for the corridor and he, too, is willing to part with his land and belongings for a good compensation.

Some 25km from Palayam are two villages – Achankuttapatty and Achankuttapatty Pudur – in Salem district where, too, farm lands and some houses fall under the corridor for the expressway.

“Our lands are taken for a good cause. We are happy over that, but we would want the government to be liberal with the compensation,” says Kannan of Achankuttapatty Pudur, whose six acres of land with mainly coconut trees are part of the corridor. He will have to give up three acres for the highway.

“The expressway is for the future generation. It will bring a lot of benefits for the state and economy. We welcome that and are willing to give our land. But we need to get a fair compensation since we have to begin from the scratch again,” says Vidyasekar of Achankuttapatty. His family had come to Achankuttapatty after giving its land near Salem for an information technology complex 30 years ago.

Fears Of Lower Compensation

Swarajya travelled to the villages where lands and houses fall under the expressway corridor on reports that the people were opposed to the project and were unwilling to part with their belongings, be it land or house. But during the visit, what we found was that these people are looking for better compensation and are more worried that they might have to settle for a lower payout. Sentimental attachment and value definitely matter to these people, but some of them are able to see reason with the government’s objective.

“I would be happy if the (state) government can give a job to either my elder son who has done M A and B Ed or my younger son who is a graduate,” Kuppusamy of Palayam village says. His elder son, who lives in a nearby village with his wife and two kids since it has better facilities, has been trying for a teacher’s job through the common test that the government holds periodically without much luck. The younger one does temporary jobs at Harur.

Kuppusamy cultivates paddy, ragi, sorghum, and tapioca on his farm depending on water availability. “Our lands are rain-fed. Rains have played truant last five years that we have grown paddy only once. Otherwise, we have gone in for hard crops like ragi that don’t need much water,” he says, adding tapioca is the best since even a little rainfall will help the plant survive for two years once it gains roots.

Kuppusamy himself does farm labour in nearby Coimbatore district, so much so that he had to miss the public hearing held by the district officials on taking over his land. “I get Rs 400 minimum daily if I work in farms in Coimbatore,” he says.

“The government should consider giving jobs to my grandson,” says Salaithoppu, whose elder grandson living in Chennai is an engineering graduate. His second grandson is in college. The elder son is engaged in poultry meat business. He attended the public hearing at Harur, but says it got disrupted by elements who were unwilling to listen to district officials’ offer for their lands.

Salaithoppu’s younger son is engaged in farm labour like Kuppusamy, while he has married off two daughters with sons-in-law as policeman and teacher.

“I get at least Rs 1,000 a week from the cows I have here,” Salaithoppu says, pointing to a couple of cows grazing nearby.

“We have been depending on farms for our livelihood. I have coconut, mango, guava, lemon, custard apple, and even timber trees on my farm. We have to find an alternative place or even buy lands somewhere. We have enquired on buying lands nearby, but prices have increased by Rs 5 lakh an acre to Rs 12 lakh an acre soon after the government said the Salem-Chennai expressway is coming up this way,” he says.

Land prices have shot up by over 70 per cent in the last three months, raising concerns of those who will be displaced and looking to settle in nearby areas.

Officials have put up posts with stones painted yellow in places where the highway will be built, but no financial aspect of the taking over of the land has been discussed with them yet.

“These farmers will be given a fair compensation over and above the 2013 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Settlement Act,” says an official engaged by the National Highways Authority of India.

Last week, the Tamil Nadu government told the Madras High Court that it would pay up to four times the value of land to the farmers.

Officials, who did not wish to be identified, said that, for example, if the value of a land is Rs 1 lakh, a farmer whose land will be taken up will be entitled to an additional Rs 1.25 lakh as per the Land Acquisition Act. The farmer will, in addition, get a 100 per cent solatium to this compensation. This means, if a farmer gets Rs 2.25 lakh per hectare for a land of his valued at Rs 1 lakh, he/she will get a solatium of Rs 2.25 lakh. So, the total compensation for a land of Rs 1 lakh value will be Rs 4.50 lakh.

“Besides, each tree of the grower is valued. A coconut tree that is good and yielding will get Rs 50,000. There is a person who stands to lose 900 of his coconut trees and he will get a compensation of Rs 4.5 crore,” says an official, adding mango trees will be valued at Rs 30,000 each depending on their growth. Values have been fixed for other variety of trees, while a compensation of Rs 25,000 will be paid for every cattle shed that will be lost. Again, even wells that will be closed will fetch as much as Rs 3.75 lakh depending on its depth and if a pumpset is attached to it.

Another official, with the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), pointed out that in 2008 when lands were acquired in Salem for the National Highway to Thiruvannamalai, farmers got poor compensation. “And compensation for this will be paid directly by NHAI. So, farmers will not have to run here and there for their money as it had happened previously,” the official said.

“We hear different statement from different persons. We haven’t heard anything from government officials. The government can counsel or talk to farmers and landowners individually and tell them what compensation they would get,” says Kannan of Achankuttapatty village, adding, “we are happy to give our lands for a national cause.”

“Farmers in these villages are hearing rumours and stories that are not true. They are being scared by rumour mongers and activists like Piyush Manush. They are even being told that they won’t get any compensation for their land. We had to use our personal equation with them and convince them that they will get good compensation. But we haven’t been able to answer how good it will be,” says an official, specially deputed by the state government, to facilitate the project.

For instance, Salaithoppu of Palayam village will get more from his trees than the two acres he is losing. “He will easily get over Rs 30 lakh,” says another official, adding that the beneficiary is yet to be informed of his actual compensation.

But what is agitating the minds of people like Vidyasekar or Kannan is that they are looking for the market value of the land and are not clear what they will be getting. “I have spent many years tending to my plants and as I near the age of 50, I thought of bringing my family and living here. We have teak, coconut, and mango trees. They all have a value that will stand good for years. No official has come forward on what we will be entitled to, despite we having come forward to give our lands. The guideline value, which we hear is used to determine compensation, is far lower than the actual price our lands command,” says Kannan.

The issue with the market value for land is, officials wonder, how it could be determined. “There is no way to determine the market value because each one has his or her own quote. We can always take the sale value of various lands sold in the area and come up with an average rate. Then, these persons will get four times the value which would be equal to or more than the market price. In addition, they get separate compensation for the trees and other belongings,” says a state government official.

The problem with the guideline value is that the Tamil Nadu government reduced it by 33 per cent last year. The value was cut to help push up sagging land sales that fell after the stamp paper duty for registration was raised to 12 per cent of the land sale value from 8 per cent. “Many of these people who now demand market value themselves never paid the due stamp duty. They now fear that they will fall victim to their own practice of paying lower registration fees. Luckily for them, a few have shown higher sale value that can stand them in good stead now,” said the state government official.

“We heard news on television that we will be paid Rs 350 per square feet for our house that will be lost to the highway. That means, I will hardly get Rs 4 lakh for it. But the cost of my house construction is nearly Rs 15 lakh. Even the jewels pledged for the construction have not been redeemed. How can I settle for a lower compensation, especially when we have to go to a new place and start from ground zero?” wonders Vidyasekar.

Government officials say the Tamil Nadu government is striving its best to ensure smooth acquisition of lands with better compensation, resettlement, and rehabilitation.

“Resettlement and rehabilitation are not part of any acquisition for infrastructure. But over here, resettlement and rehabilitation are being made. District collectors in the five districts are going all out to ensure no one who offers his or her land will be affected,” says the government official.

Last week, Chief Minister Edappadi K Palaniswami handed over documents of fresh land allotments to five persons. A few persons in Achankuttapatty village have also received pattas for the new place they will be moving to soon. The officials have sent a list of more persons losing their houses in Achankuttapatty village to the district collector so that they can be allotted lands or houses.

“If any vacant government land is available, we are giving it to these people who are giving their lands. In some cases like Palayam village, the collector has ordered allotment of houses under the “housing for all” scheme. We are even getting them loans to construct new houses under the Prime Minister’s housing scheme,” said the state government official.

During Swarajya’s visit to these villages, people talked more about better compensation and are willing to give their lands and belongings. NHAI and state government officials say that once they discuss the compensation package with the people, they will realise the benefits. “Right now, they are angry because of misgivings like they having to travel over 50km to access even their land that could be across the road. Scare-mongers have even told these villagers that high walls will prevent them access throughout,” says the NHAI official.

The Swarajya team didn’t witness any protest or murmur against the project nor did it come across any written material against it. This was despite Pattali Makkal Katchi youth leader Anbumani Ramadoss holding a public hearing at nearby Ammapettai at the same time on 27 June.

The bottom line, then, is that farmers are ready to give their lands for the project, only that they will have to be taken into confidence on the compensation package that each will be entitled to.

 

Chennai Metro Fare Tussle: Madras High Court Dismisses Plea Demanding Fares Be Brought Down To Suburban Rail Fares

0

The Madras High Court yesterday (28 June) dismissed a petition seeking to reduce fares on the Chennai Metro to those on the Chennai Suburban Rail, reports PTI. A division bench comprising of Justices K K Sashidharan and R Subramanian said that the petition had in no way shown that higher fares were an infringement of his fundamental rights.

Merely because, Chennai Metro has been adopting a fare structure, which is high compared to the fare collected by suburban trains or other countries, it cannot be said that a situation has come for the high court to interfere in the matter. In short, it is not the function of the court to decide the correctness of the fare structure evolved by the Metro Rail. We are therefore of the view that the writ petition filed by the petitioner deserves to be dismissed in limine.
The Observation Made By The Bench

The petition, filed by M G R Viswanathan had argued that the Metro charged Rs 70 for a trip from Chennai Central to Chennai International Airport while the same journey on a suburban train – from Chennai Central to Tirusulam – was being charged Rs 5 in Second Class. The petition however did not mention that First Class fares on the Suburban line Rs 80.